Are there any any Virgins on Earth?

The following article is a two part argument. The first part is entitled "Are there any Virgins on Earth" and the second title of this series of articles is "Fayzal is the first Male "Virgin Mary" on Planet Earth". Enjoy the reading.

On Monday the 22nd September their appeared an article in my local newspaper The Star (South Africa) stating that a French Muslim male divorced / annulled his marriage because his wife was not a virgin when he got married to her.

At first the only vision that came to my mind was the Prophet Muhammad cartoon depicting an angel telling suicide terrorist to stop as there a no more virgins in heaven, but I thereafter began to seriously ponder  the dilemma of this French Muslim's attempt to marry a virgin.

It is statistically stated that minors ( male and female) are 90% likely to have sex before the age of sixteen. The remaining 9% likely to have sex before the age of eighteen (the balance of 1% are either to stupid or to ugly to get sex). This statistic applies worldwide. The question I would like to initially pose is how does a Muslim and any other religious person seeking virgins are able to obtain this rare commodity. I mean the only way out is for Muslims to apply the traditions of Prophet Muhammad and that is to catch these girls when they are young before they start experimenting sexually, that is at the age of nine years old. Perhaps Prophet Muhammad was a wise man after all, knowing exactly what age to catch virgins.

However the problem facing Muslim men got me thinking further and I realized that in the interest of fairness and equality that is provided by all religions Muslim women must also be experiencing the same problem. I mean that if Muslim men feel that they have a right to marry virgins then surely Muslim women have an equal right to marry virgin men.

Therefore the question I would like to pose at this stage is:

"Are there any virgins still existing on planet earth and what difference does it make sexually if a women is a virgin or NOT?"

Fayzal.

PS.- I will continue with Part two arising from this discussion to show why I am the first MALE "VIRGIN MARY" on Planet Earth the following week.

6180#

Prophet Abraham - Sane or Mad Man / Saint or Sinner

On the 1^st October, 2008 there was a brazen headlined article in The Star newspaper  which caught my attention. Briefly the article described how in a ruthless manner a brother and sister murdered their mother and cold bloodedly thereafter murdered their father. These were the Lotter siblings. What caught my attention was not the fact that the Lotter siblings admitted that they murdered their parents but the reason for them committing this murder…and get this reason:

The Lotter siblings claimed that the reason for murdering their parents was that “God wanted them to do it”.

This reason, astonishing in itself really got me thinking about the behavior of human beings, especially the religious, pious human beings. Here is my argument and please follow what I have to say very carefully.

Either the reason that God made them commit the murder is true or not true.

If the reason is true then God is a MURDERER using human beings as His agent to carry out His MURDEROUS DEEDS.

If the reason is false then the Lotter siblings are either deranged and should be put into a mental asylum where all MAD person are treated or if the reason is false and the Lotter siblings are not mad then they should face life in prison for their dastard deed.

This incident reminded me of another similar incident in America where a Christian mother murdered her three young children by drowning them in a bath. Again the mother in this incident claimed that God had spoken to her to sacrifice her children. The court came to the conclusion that this woman was mentally deranged and agreed to send her to an asylum for observation and treatment.

Another incident, again in America, occurred when another Christian mother slit the throats of her two young kids claiming that God had instructed her to kill her children. In this case the courts concluded that the mother was not deranged and instead sentenced her to life in prison for the killing of her children.

I will repeat my conclusions in the above case similar to the Lotter siblings.

Either the reason that God made them commit the murder is true or not true.

If the reason is true then God is a MURDERER using human beings as His agent to carry out His MURDEROUS DEEDS.

If the reason is false then the sentence these Christian mothers received is correct i.e mental asylum for madness or life in prison.

Let’s rewind time by approximately three thousand years. Remember the story of Prophet Abraham. He claimed just as these Christian American mothers claimed that God had spoken to him to sacrifice his son i.e kill his son as a test of obedience to God. If we intend to be fair minded human beings claiming to be just and reasonable in applying our laws equally then I want to pose the very same question I posed in the Lotter sibling’s case to Prophet Abraham and that is:

Either the reason that God made Prophet Abraham to  commit the murder is true or not true.

If the reason is true then God is a MURDERER using human beings as His agent to carry out His MURDEROUS DEEDS.

If the reason is false then  Prophet Abraham is a mad / deranged man who if he were living in our modern world deserves to be sent to a mental asylum.

To conclude the question I would like to pose to all MWEB bloggers is this

Is Prophet Abraham sane or a mad man?

Is Prophet Abraham a saint or a sinner?

Fayzal Mahamed.

Fayzal, “the Masturbator Dad” is back again.

I’m sorry for not having posted any articles on this blog for a long time now. I’ve just been busy sharing my knowledge with radio SAFM and radio 702 and some international debating forums such as Infidels.org that I have not had time and neglected MWEB, South Africa’s finest home blog network.

For those that are new to MWeb since my departure about a year ago allow me to introduce myself.  I am an atheist, a secular humanist and a humanist. I have written many articles concerning religious racialism, tyranny, human rights etc on this blog and other forums and newspapers. My most famous article on MWeb occurred in February 2007 when I appeared on Radio 702 stating that I masturbate my son who suffers from severe cerebral palsy and who is totally handicapped / disabled. I also explained that the reason for masturbating my son was entirely for his health and sexual wellbeing.

After this article appeared on MWeb three events transpired thereafter.

1.       A case of sexual abuse was reported by a member of this MWeb blog to the South African Police

2.       MWeb Blog administrators banned / censored my article from appearing on this blog.

3.       An article appeared on 24.com stating the complaint against me but going further with the innuendo that I am abusing my son.

I wish to report that after fifteen month of investigation the South African Police has refused to lay any charge of sexual abuse or child molestation against me. Given that the South African Police has refused to lay charges against me I claim that my activity of masturbating my severe cerebral palsied son for health reason is completely legal.

I therefore feel vindicated for the love and care I bestowed on my son to the extent I wish to declare myself the BEST, MOST LOVING DAD in the world. I also wish to notify members of this MWEB blog that I am comfortable with the title bestowed to me by the newspaper 24.com and that is “Masturbator Dad” I will therefore be addressing all my articles on this blog with the title of Fayzal “Masturbator Dad”

However as a respect towards this MWEB blog and their rights, I will not be discussing the issue of the masturbation of my severe cerebral palsied son. I therefore request members to refrain from posting any comments concerning my activity as I do not think that this is the right forum for such a debate.

Back to the present. I’ve noticed in my absence how members of this blog who are 90% Christian shouting “Hellaluyah” and “Love Jesus” openly in public. I need to put a damper on such unbecoming behavior.

Title of article:

Are Christians / Muslim / Jews Racist?

Remember the recent past when the WHITE MAN was claiming he was SUPERIOR to all other human beings because of the color of his / her skin. I am sure we all recognize this SUPERIORITY in the new South Africa as RACIALISM. Therefore my argument goes as follows.

Those persons that feel that they are SUPERIOR to other human beings by way of the color of their skin, or their religious beliefs, or their cultural beliefs, or because of their gender, or because of their sexual orientation are regarded as RACIST and this constitutes RACIALISM.

Let’s unpack my argument concerning religious behavior.

If A Christian states he or she loves Jesus Christ and that Jesus is his or her savior that I would state “If this is what makes you happy and what you are comfortable with, Good for you!”

However if A Christian states that all human beings should love Jesus and that those that reject Jesus as the savior of all of humanity are bad then  I would say that “this is a talk of a RACIST, a person who regards himself / herself as SUPERIOR to the next human being because of his / her religious belief.”

If a Christian were to say that he / she thinks that they he or she is a good person and has been promised heaven for their good deeds I would say “Great! Good for you if you have those beliefs”. If a Christian were to go further and state that ALL bad human beings , immaterial of their religious beliefs were going to hell I would say “Great! Good for you if you have those beliefs”.

However if a Christian were to state that all Christians who accepted Jesus as the Savior will be going to heaven and all other person who are not Christians or who not accepted Jesus as their Savior will be going to hell I will state this is a talk of a RACIST, a person who regards himself / herself as SUPERIOR to the next human being because of his / her religious belief.”

Similarly, if a Muslim was to state that he / she regards Allah as the one and only God and Prophet Muhammad as the seal (final) prophet of God I will state “Great! Good for you if you have those beliefs”.

However if a Muslim were to state that all other religious people who worship idols or have many Gods and those that do not accept Prophet Muhammad as the final prophet as bad people doomed for hell than I will state this is a talk of a RACIST, a person who regards himself / herself as SUPERIOR to the next human being because of his / her religious belief.”

Finally if a Jew was to state that he / or she feels “chosen” to guide mankind to the right path I would say “Great! Good for you if you have those beliefs”

However if a Jew feels that I am a bad person doomed to hell because I do not share her beliefs or disagree that Jews are the chosen people to guide mankind that I will state this is a talk of a RACIST, a person who regards himself / herself as SUPERIOR to the next human being because of his / her religious belief.”

If an Atheist feels that Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is the only correct scientific theory depicting the evolution of human from the “ancestral ape” than I would say “Great! Good for you if you have those beliefs”.

However if  an Atheist were to declare that any person not accepting Darwin’s theory of evolution as immoral than I will state that this is a talk of a RACIST, a person who regards himself / herself as SUPERIOR to the next human being because of his / her irreligious belief.”

I hope that the above examples indicate how religious beliefs and  atheistic beliefs can be used positively in a cultural / scientific manner or negatively in a RACIST / Superior manner.

Fayzal Mahamed.

PS. I know how irritated many MWEB bloggers get when I repost my article over and over again. I wish to inform you that I love your “irritation”. Please be advised that I will repost this article on the hour every hour till I feel that this “horse” has been flogged to death.

#

On Thursday the 31^st of January, 2008 there appeared a small article stuck somewhere inconspicuously with the following report:

Praise for death sentence

Kabul - Afghanistan's Senate has lauded the death sentence handed down against a journalist found guilty of insulting Islam. It also condemned what it called "international interference" to have the sentence annulled. The 23-year-old journalist distributed a report he printed off the Internet to journalism students. The article asked why men could have four spouses but women couldn't.

I am shocked! 

Last year we had a similar episode in Afghanistan where a Christian convert was sentenced to death for apostasy. After international pressure prevailed the convert  ( apostate) was pardoned and allowed asylum in Italy. 

The notion of a death penalty being applied to a man who enquired about the basic human right of equality is appalling. Such a crime and such a sentence goes against the grain of modern civility. The idea that any person could incur a death sentence for expressing  a simple notion of equality must be termed BARBARIC.

The question I am asking is “If the death sentence handed down is so crass and gross against the notion of civility and if this death sentence is endorsed by the nations senate, then surely I have a right to term the Afghan nation as BARBARIC.”

I repeat the question:

“Are Afghans Barbaric?”

Fayzal.

Have you ever wonder why in our modern age of great scientific advancement in every single possible field including the study of the mind, we are still face with an archaic, barbaric view of human beings who commit suicide?

For the purpose of this article I want to call all those who do commit suicide as SUICIDERS.

You just have to see when any famous person dies of suspected suicide and you will find a flat denial by the bereaved family that this could have taken place, and if it is proven that such an act did take place than the family members would distanced themselves from the suicide by claiming he / she was not close them or was a lonely person that kept to himself / herself etc…Often words such as useless, failure, imperfect, shameless, good for nothing, ungrateful etc. ..are bandied about describing the character of the suicider.